My rating: 3 of 5 stars
I liked this. The two initial parts created some interesting characters, but then sadly it ended just as it was getting rolling. This would make a good novel length story…
I’d been very good in 2011. I tidied my room whenever I was told and always ate my greens without complaint, except for sprouts of course but that goes without saying. Father Christmas was very happy and said (s)he’d bring me something special: an e-book reader. Unfortunately, Father Christmas gets confused by anything more technical than the TV’s remote control so (s)he asked me to choose which one was best.
In the UK we have two frustrating problems with technology: it’s overpriced and often it’s not as readily available. Americans can choose from a bucket load of e-readers. You have numerous e-ink Kindles and the new Amazon tablet, you have several models of B&N’s Nook, there’s the Sonys plus many, many others. For us Brits, we have two, bottom of the range, non-touch Kindles (with or without keyboard) and the touch screen Kobo which WHSmith’s started to sell in-store late last year. And that’s it. More of a coin flip that a choice.
Now, one thing I should admit, is that I always tend to support the under-dog, a very typical British attribute. I don’t like to see big guys pushing their weight about and people mindlessly following without considering the alternatives. For this reason, I’ve never bought Apple products; not because I don’t like them, it’s just that I prefer the alternatives. For example, Father Christmas has an iPhone 4 and it’s a very nice phone but I much prefer my Android HTC Sensation. I love my Zune MP3 player and my Acer netbook is exactly what I needed. I didn’t consciously shun Apple, it’s simply that the alternatives suited me better.
I mention this, because I often hear the same one-horse, no alternative argument being used by those who buy Kindles. Post Christmas sales figures would agree with this, they show that Kindles were a soaring success. Over a million e-book readers were sold in the UK over the 2011 festive period and a staggering 94% of these were Kindles. Jeff Bezos, I suspect, may be smiling quite broadly right now.
I agree that Kindles are nice little e-readers. I’ve used an old keyboard Kindle and found it to be a great device. The screen is excellent, the design slick and the choice of books is second to none. The new Kindle definitely looks better than its predecessor and the lack of the dedicated keyboard doesn’t hinder its use. If you like reading and like variety in what you read, then you can’t go wrong with a Kindle.
So, having said all that, you may be surprised to hear that I asked Father Christmas to slide down my chimney with a Kobo Touch in his sack. Father Christmas didn’t mind, the prices were pretty much the same, the Kobo was only £10 more, and they come in pretty colours so (s)he and my daughter like playing with it as well.
The main advantage for going with the Kobo is stated in the product’s name, Touch. Whenever I use a non-touch device these days, I find myself poking the screen and, to the amusement of anyone watching, waiting patiently for something to happen. Well designed touch screen interfaces can make the user experience so much more intuitive, and the Kobo’s is excellent. My eight year old daughter loves flicking through some of the fairy tale books I’ve downloaded when we’re in the car, it is that easy to use. To me, this was the clincher.
In other respects, the devices are pretty similar. The e-ink is the same, the responsiveness is comparable and so is the capacity. Yep, the Kindle has better book availability, but the Kobo is good enough. Sure, the Kindle has audio support, but I’ve got a phone with an Audible app. The Kindle has better magazine/paper coverage, but again, that doesn’t interest me. So for me, the Kobo was the perfect choice and has been an excellent device which I’m very, very pleased with.
As an aside, I’d read several reports from the Wall Street Journal and others which claim people with e-book readers read more than their paper-based counterparts. I was sceptical about this, but having now got a device, I totally agree. I’ve read three novels in a fortnight, which is considerably more than I would’ve otherwise. This could partially be explained by the ‘new toy’ mentality but e-readers do give more freedom, and not just because of the reader, the technology itself is liberating.
Both the Kindle and the Kobo have smart phone apps which sync with the e-reader. So if I read a few pages on the reader before snuggling up beside Father Christmas in bed, the next day I can seamlessly carry on reading on my phone during the lunch break at work. This continuity allows me to read a book when I want, where I want, without having to wedge a cumbersome paperback into my back pocket, and this flexibility is definitely encouraging me to read more.
In conclusion, regarding the devices, if you’re thinking of an e-book reader, consider the Kobo. Kindles are a good choice, but they aren’t the only choice. If you are a mobile person and enjoy reading, definitely get a Kobo or a Kindle. I can guarantee you won’t regret it.
When I started writing, I decided I wanted to do it to the best of my ability. I bought the books and scoured the Internet, and over time, in my opinion, my writing improved. Obviously that’s a personal point of view, but for the sake of the hours I put into it, my ego would prefer to believe that’s exactly what happened.
During this time, I concentrated on the creative process, the mechanics of the writing: how to write fluent pros or how to define the motivations for the protagonist, that sort of thing. I plotted and planned, wrote and edited, and produced a series of short stories that I was proud of. These stories were writing exercises and helped find my voice for the larger projects which were bouncing around my head, some of which I have since embarked upon.
Throughout this, I hadn’t even considered the commercial aspect to writing. So as I became more content with my writing, I started to research what I needed to do to get those stories read by as many people as possible. Obviously the financial side played a role, many people could equate to many pennies, but it’s also the pride of being enjoyed by a large readership. During that research, one of the pieces of advice that I came across time and time again, was to create a blog.
Blogs serve many purposes, they’re not just solely marketing and promotional tools. They can share links and other interesting tit-bits of knowledge, they can give your readers a window into your life or they can show how your writing is able to adapt to non-fiction. Personally, the thing I find most helpful about blogs, particularly blogs centered around writing, is to see what other people are doing, how they did it and what traps they either avoided or fell into. This is what I’ve personally tended to blog about so far though I do hope to include some fiction in the near future.
So, having established that a blog was worthwhile, the next step was to turn that concept into a reality. The first stage was easy: registering the domain name. I used 123-reg, found the domain name I wanted, set up a direct debit and pressed “go”. That was all done in less than five minutes. There are heaps of registration companies offering these services, both registration and hosting, and these are easy to find and are very affordable.
Luckily a friend of mine offered to host the site so that saved a bit of money. Speaking of which, if you ever need anything web related, speak to him, Allan Jardine; he’s a smart cookie and has just started consulting.
My site is managed by cPanel, a hosting management platform that enables non-technical users to setup and maintain their servers. In just a few clicks I had a basic web page and an email forwarder. So far so good, everything progressing very nicely.
It was then time to think about how I would create and maintain a web site and blog. Fifteen years ago I created my old employer’s web site by using Notepad to hand craft HTML. It was laborious, but it worked. I wasn’t expecting it to be that cumbersome these days, fifteen years is a long time in the computer industry, but then again, I wasn’t expecting it to be as easy as it was either. I knew Word could export web pages, but I suspected I could do better, so I started to look into what other authoring tools were available.
Google searches kept returning references to WordPress, which I soon learned, like Movable Type and Textpattern, is a blogging package that can also be used to build a basic web site. Yep, you can’t do fancy web-sites with these, but I had no intention of doing anything particularly whizzy, a bit of text and a few images, nothing more than that. After more research, I chose WordPress.
WordPress provides a step-by-step video on how to install their package through cPanel, following that was a doddle. I spent a few hours poking about, making pages then tearing them down, trying the different formats and templates, but generally the defaults were good enough for what I wanted to do. Note that WordPress can host your blog if you don’t mind using their domain name, i.e. your-blog-name.wordpress.org, or you can install on your own server as I did.
By the end of that first evening, the “Welcome to my blog” post was up and running. It really was as simple as that.
Over the next few weeks I wanted to extend the blog. So more research, more following of simple instructions and finally more stress-free functionality. All for free. Isn’t that a great price? Bear in mind though that it is good practice to ‘tip’ the creator of add-on’s if they’re doing it commercially.
These are the add-on’s I’m currently using, or widgets in WordPress parlance.
The final one, and in my opinion the most valuable, is Google Analytics. At a basic level, this phenomenal piece of free software allows you to see how many people are visiting your site. In addition, if you’re interested, you can also see how long each visitor spends on each page, where they live and pretty much everything else about them apart from the colour of their underwear.
I must confess, I do work in I.T. so I’m not entirely clueless when it comes to computers. But the ease with which these packages can be installed and the functionality they provide, and provide for free, is extremely impressive.
I hope this post has helped show how easy it is to set-up up a blog. Please look around mine and see what you think. I know it won’t win any prizes at the next technology awards, but it’s exactly what I wanted: quick, free and low maintenance.
The tools are there, so give it a try. Get blogging!
It was a competition that encouraged me to to write. I’d always planned to ‘knock out a novel’ at some point in my life but there was always something with a higher priority and lower importance that seemed to get in the way (drinking, watching TV, etc.).
As the saying goes, deadlines force results, and for me, it was that first competition deadline that drove my writing ambitions. My first short story, Body Recyclers, was entered into the Bristol Short Story Prize (BSSP) last year. Their fifth competition is being launched this week which I’ll be entering with hopefully better results! I’ll also send a couple of flash stories to the Reader’s Digest 100-Word Story. It’ll be a busy month.
The point of this article is that these competitions serve two purposes for me, well, three if the entry is successful. If successful, the marketing value would be immense. I would no longer be ‘new author Colin Marks,’ I would be ‘award winning author Colin Marks.’ Plus, I’d win enough money to replace my sick beer fridge, my broken pride and joy.
But even without the prestige of winning, these competitions are rewarding. First, it forces me to try something new, like fitting a complete story into 100 words. All those Creative Writing courses and books instruct us to frequently practice different techniques and styles, but how often do we do that? It’s hard enough to find the time to write what I need to write, let alone find additional time to practice along the way. Competitions force you to do just that. Writing exercises are always done half-heartedly and with little enthusiasm, but when you write for a competition, where the quality of your output will be judged, the motivation level sky-rockets.
The second benefit, is that writing something to a restricted length forces the prose to be tight. The 100 word flash is an extreme case, but even the BSSP’s 3000 word limit is challenging. I’m currently writing a novel which I hope will be ready in a few months, though my self-imposed end-of-year deadline is currently looking frighteningly ambitious. After stripping down my 100 and 3000 word competition entries until they were tighter than the trousers at a Weight Watchers gathering, my novel now feels incredibly bloated. That first edit is going to be brutal, large sections of text will be slashed and any long-winded descriptions will be kicked into the bin.
My aim is to enter at least six competitions a year. I will always enter the BSSP as this one is special, it opened my eyes to a whole new creative world, plus I live in Bristol so it’s local! The others will be varied so I can regularly try different techniques. It’s worthwhile and I do benefit from it.
So give it a shot, I’m confident you’ll find the experience valuable. And should you happen to win a beer fridge in any of these competitions, remember me, you’ll instantly become my best-friend-forever!
I started writing fiction for public consumption just over a year ago. A colleague and I were strolling one lunchtime, joking about a futuristic concept of body recycling when she suggested, probably half-heartedly, that I should knock that into a story and submit it to the Bristol Short Story Prize. As I’m always very well behaved and do exactly as I’m told, that’s exactly what I did. Tanya, the strolling colleague, and Mark, a friend from way back when, polished the story with some fine editing then off it went, submitted over the Internet to the BSSP website!
This was the first fiction I’d written in over twenty years, yet I honestly thought I would at least reach the long-list and with a little wind in my sails, possibly make the short-list. Even the little realism I’d held onto made me realise winning probably wasn’t on the table, though it might be, unlikely, but certainly possible, if only…
The day of the announcement for the long-list approached and I was F5’ing my browser all day long, keen to see how high I would be on the list. And then, after one refresh, there it was. Not me on the list of course, just the list on my screen, and with my name glaringly absent. At the time I’ll admit I was a little put out, who wouldn’t be, but with a thick skin and a thin copy of an earlier BSSP short-list compilation, I soon realised why I wasn’t on the list. And not only why I wasn’t on the list, but why my story probably wasn’t even read all the way through.
The thing is, BSSP isn’t a little story competition for people who live in Bristol; the entrants are national, even international. To confirm that, I just picked up the third anthology: the winner was Irish (though living in Manchester) and second place went to an Edinburgh based Scot.
I liked my story, I thought it was good and I still do, but I’m certain a large part of the problem wasn’t the story itself, it was the presentation! If you could make a list of things that you need to do properly before submitting to an agent, publisher, competition, etc., my submission would have ignored them all. It wasn’t that I was trying to make an artistic statement in my layout, some kind of Tracy Emin’s approach to writing, the simple truth was that I didn’t know any better.
Since then, I’ve researched what I should have done a few months earlier and updated the formatting. That first story, Body Recyclers, has now been published on Mark Coker’s Smashwords and Amazon. Smashwords publish on numerous sites so the formatting in any submitted work needs to be generic and clean; to aid this Mark released a style guide which not only defines the “you must do’s” but also the “you must not’s”. At the same time, I read the excellent ‘The First Five Pages: A Writer’s Guide To Staying Out of the Rejection Pile’ from Noah Lukeman, and numerous blogs, such as Joanna Penn’s and Joel Friedlander’s.
My tip for the day is this: before you submit anything, make sure you read at least a couple of the above blogs or publications, the advice is invaluable. I do like the premise to Noah’s book: you’ve got five pages to prove your book is worth reading. As he says, some books can be dismissed on the first paragraph, even the first line, and that would be well before those words you spent hours trying to chose the correct lilt and rhythm for are even encountered. So do yourself a favour, tackle the layout!
One piece of advice you will hear over and over is to keep it simple. Avoid dainty flourishes such as mixing fonts or a wild variety of point sizes, just keep it simple. If you give too much attention to numerous styles then so will the reader, and this will detract their attention from the content. Whilst it may look fantastic, they came to your book expecting a good read, not to be distracted by artistic embellishment.
You probably think fonts are straightforward and you can chose what you want and at any size. Not so. With the exception of the first character in each section, fonts should never be larger than 12-point. Smashwords suggest you should avoid all exotic fonts and stay with the tried and tested, such as Times New Roman, Garamond and Arial. Joel Friedlander prefers the historical fonts: Garamond, Janson, Bembo, Caslon and Electra.
Once you’ve got your fonts pinned down, you need to consider the layout. Indent each paragraph, but be careful to use paragraph styles rather than using tabs or spaces. When submitting a hard copy, your manuscript should be double space, or at a minimum, one-and-a-half. For ebook publishing, use single or one-and-a-half, anything larger looks bad on an e-reader.
The point of this was to make you aware of the options and to point you towards great resources of information. I hope this has done that and I hope this has been useful.
And by the way, BSSP5 will be accepting submissions soon, so pull out that pen/netbook/computer and get writing. But don’t make the mistakes I made, remember to get that formatting correct!
Last week I read a good discussion on somebody’s blog that basically said you should be pricing your fiction in bands based on the word count. He was saying something along the lines of 0.99c for every 10k to 20k words is a reasonable fee for his output. I really wished I’d kept the link so I could reference it here; it was good a discussion and was certainly worth a read but as I finished it, I just wholeheartedly disagreed with his conclusion.
The basis for his discussion was that as a producer, he needed to be paid for the work that he generated. I’m not disagreeing with that. The farmer won’t give me a bag of potatoes for free and sadly the barman always asks me to leave his premises when I demand a free pint. If you want it, you pay for it.
However, and here’s the sting, writing is different. Not uniquely different, I’d say music is the same, but it is different. There’s a bus load of really good material out there for free. You may have to dig around for it and know where to look, but lets face it, it’s there and it’s very good. And, for a few pennies more, you can buy good quality novels for 99c, take Joanna Penn’s Pentecost for example. A short story is 2-10k words, novels are 80-100k; why pay for a short story when you can get a novel for the same price. Would you pay the same in a cinema to watch a 5 minute cartoon as you would a 100 minute feature?
As you’ve probably gathered, the basis for my pricing argument here isn’t the production, it’s the consumption. If you can dig around and find good stuff for free, why would you dig around and pay for mine. I’m not an established author, I don’t have a global reputation for quality writing so my name isn’t at the top of any reading lists. Hopefully that will change in the future, but currently, that’s the way it is, that’s the world I’m living in.
When I first published my books on Smashwords and Amazon, my readership counts were good and were exactly as expected. I put out messages on Facebook and Twitter, and many of my friends took a nose either to support me or just out of simple curiosity. Once they’d done their business and read all they wanted, those counts dropped away, but there’s still a steady stream of readers. The counts currently are in the order of several thousands, far more friends than I have, so my work is getting out to a bigger audience and this is excellent. And hopefully it’s getting me a reputation and a fan base, all good stuff.
But that happened because those early books were free. Had I have charged, even if my writing was so beautiful it could make angels weep, I wouldn’t have needed many heavenly hankies because no-one would’ve read it. My counts would be the sum of my wealthier friends and families, and then the numbers would’ve flat-lined.
So, in conclusion, I believe the pricing needs to be pragmatic. If you’ve got a following and people look for your work, then you can charge a reasonable amount. If you don’t, and like me you’re just one of those faceless writers toiling late into the night, chasing the dream, then we need to incentivise people to find our work and to read it. And if that means making those books free, then that’s what it needs.
I’d rather be read by several thousand people than make just about enough for a single pint!
The problem is, I’ve got quite a thirst, so I’d better get that following soon…
This is a big step for me. Honestly! It may seem small to you, but I’ve never been one to embrace this internet world in which we live!!
Years ago when every one was registering domain names in the hope that Pespi or Gap or some other international giant would buy our URL for silly pennies, I followed suit. I registered a URL, youngfolk.com, sat on it for a couple of years, and when it expired I thought nothing about it. This was the closest I ever came to having an on-line presence.
Then I decided one day in 2010 to try my hand at writing. I’ve been enjoying fiction and non-fiction for years and have a very impressive pile of books, some of which I’ve even read, and I thought to myself, why I don’t get some of those story ideas floating around in my head down on paper. So I did.
This coincided with two separate events. A good friend, Tanya, decided to write a novel and joined a writing class and eventually a writing group to help pin it down. Another friend, Mark, bravely bit the bullet and resigned from the I.T. world to follow his dream of script writing. Both of them have been fantastic. Their feedback of my first short story was so positive it was like a drug. They’d both taken that leap, and I wanted to follow. I wanted to write. And then write more. And more. So I did.
Right now I’m a good way through my first novel, a magical story for kids. This will primarily be a Christmas present for my gorgeous daughter (I’m sure her name will feature in future posts so I’ll skip that distraction here) so I’m working towards a hard deadline which fingers crossed, I hope I can achieve. Since deadlines sound like ‘real’ writing, this novel will be the kick-off to my life of ‘real’ writing. If the novel is well received, or setting the bar lower, not panned too badly, then I’ll write more.
I’m enjoying the writing. And I hope you are all enjoying the reading. Let’s start this journey together!!